Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? ImmunityBio, Inc. or Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotech Giants: A Decade of SG&A Cost Strategies

__timestampImmunityBio, Inc.Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201443260001860000
Thursday, January 1, 20152262060002963000
Friday, January 1, 2016943910006961000
Sunday, January 1, 20175382100011779000
Monday, January 1, 20183546300013697000
Tuesday, January 1, 20194645600015749000
Wednesday, January 1, 20207131800018638000
Friday, January 1, 202113525600027196000
Saturday, January 1, 202210270800031739000
Sunday, January 1, 202312962000033491000
Loading chart...

Unleashing the power of data

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Biotech Firms

In the competitive world of biotechnology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for financial health. ImmunityBio, Inc. and Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc. have taken different paths in this regard over the past decade. From 2014 to 2023, ImmunityBio's SG&A expenses have fluctuated significantly, peaking in 2015 with a staggering 2,262% increase from the previous year. In contrast, Protagonist Therapeutics has maintained a more consistent trajectory, with a steady rise in expenses, culminating in a 79% increase from 2014 to 2023.

ImmunityBio's strategy appears to involve aggressive spending, possibly to fuel rapid growth or innovation, while Protagonist Therapeutics seems to focus on steady, controlled expansion. This divergence in financial strategy highlights the varied approaches companies can take in managing operational costs, each with its own set of risks and rewards.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025