Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Johnson & Johnson or Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.

SG&A Cost Management: Stability vs. Growth

__timestampJohnson & JohnsonNeurocrine Biosciences, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20142195400000017986000
Thursday, January 1, 20152120300000032480000
Friday, January 1, 20161994500000068081000
Sunday, January 1, 201721420000000169906000
Monday, January 1, 201822540000000248932000
Tuesday, January 1, 201922178000000354100000
Wednesday, January 1, 202022084000000433300000
Friday, January 1, 202120118000000583300000
Saturday, January 1, 202219046000000752700000
Sunday, January 1, 202320112000000887600000
Loading chart...

In pursuit of knowledge

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Companies

In the competitive world of pharmaceuticals, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Over the past decade, Johnson & Johnson and Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. have taken different paths in optimizing these costs.

From 2014 to 2023, Johnson & Johnson's SG&A expenses have shown a slight decline, with a 9% reduction from 2014 to 2022, before a slight uptick in 2023. This indicates a strategic focus on cost efficiency, despite their massive scale. In contrast, Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. has seen a dramatic increase in SG&A expenses, rising nearly 50 times from 2014 to 2023. This surge reflects their aggressive expansion and investment in growth.

While Johnson & Johnson's approach highlights stability and efficiency, Neurocrine's strategy underscores growth and market penetration. Both strategies offer valuable insights into managing SG&A costs in the pharmaceutical industry.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025