Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Johnson & Johnson or Xencor, Inc.

SG&A Cost Management: J&J vs. Xencor

__timestampJohnson & JohnsonXencor, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014219540000007461000
Thursday, January 1, 20152120300000011960000
Friday, January 1, 20161994500000013108000
Sunday, January 1, 20172142000000017501000
Monday, January 1, 20182254000000022472000
Tuesday, January 1, 20192217800000024286000
Wednesday, January 1, 20202208400000029689000
Friday, January 1, 20212011800000038837000
Saturday, January 1, 20221904600000047489000
Sunday, January 1, 20232011200000053379000
Loading chart...

Unlocking the unknown

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Companies

In the competitive world of pharmaceuticals and biotechnology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Johnson & Johnson, a global healthcare giant, and Xencor, Inc., a biotechnology innovator, offer a fascinating study in contrasts. From 2014 to 2023, Johnson & Johnson's SG&A expenses showed a slight decline of about 9%, from approximately $21.95 billion to $20.11 billion. This indicates a strategic focus on cost optimization despite their vast scale. In contrast, Xencor, Inc. experienced a significant increase in SG&A expenses, skyrocketing by over 600% from $7.46 million to $53.38 million. This surge reflects Xencor's aggressive growth and expansion strategy. While Johnson & Johnson's expenses are massive, their ability to slightly reduce costs over a decade is noteworthy. Meanwhile, Xencor's rising costs highlight the challenges and investments required for growth in the biotech sector.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025