Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc. or Xencor, Inc.

Biotech SG&A: Rhythm vs. Xencor's Cost Strategies

__timestampRhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Xencor, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201412130007461000
Thursday, January 1, 2015342500011960000
Friday, January 1, 2016631100013108000
Sunday, January 1, 2017951800017501000
Monday, January 1, 20182808000022472000
Tuesday, January 1, 20193655000024286000
Wednesday, January 1, 20204612500029689000
Friday, January 1, 20216848600038837000
Saturday, January 1, 20229203200047489000
Sunday, January 1, 202311753200053379000
Loading chart...

Data in motion

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Biotechs

In the competitive world of biotechnology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for financial health. Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Xencor, Inc. have been navigating this landscape since 2014. Over the past decade, Rhythm Pharmaceuticals has seen a staggering increase in SG&A expenses, growing nearly 9,600% from 2014 to 2023. In contrast, Xencor, Inc. has managed a more modest increase of about 615% over the same period.

A Closer Look

By 2023, Rhythm Pharmaceuticals' SG&A expenses reached approximately 117 million, while Xencor's were around 53 million. This suggests that Rhythm Pharmaceuticals is investing heavily in its administrative and sales functions, potentially to support rapid growth or expansion. Meanwhile, Xencor's more conservative spending may reflect a focus on efficiency or a different strategic approach. Understanding these trends can provide valuable insights into each company's operational strategies and market positioning.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025