Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. or Grifols, S.A.

SG&A Cost Management: Grifols vs. Madrigal

__timestampGrifols, S.A.Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201466077200015746000
Thursday, January 1, 201573643500013392000
Friday, January 1, 20167752660009290000
Sunday, January 1, 20178603480007672000
Monday, January 1, 201881477500015293000
Tuesday, January 1, 201994282100022648000
Wednesday, January 1, 202098561600021864000
Friday, January 1, 2021106150800037318000
Saturday, January 1, 2022119042300048130000
Sunday, January 1, 20231254234000108146000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Companies

In the competitive world of pharmaceuticals, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Over the past decade, Grifols, S.A. and Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. have taken distinct paths in optimizing these costs. Grifols, a global leader in plasma-derived medicines, has seen its SG&A expenses rise steadily, peaking at approximately 1.25 billion in 2023, a 90% increase from 2014. This growth reflects its expansive global operations and strategic investments.

Conversely, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, a smaller player focused on innovative therapies, has maintained a more conservative SG&A growth. From 2014 to 2023, their expenses increased by about 587%, reaching 108 million. This sharp rise, however, is from a much smaller base, indicating strategic scaling efforts.

The contrasting strategies highlight the balance between growth and cost management, offering valuable insights for investors and industry analysts.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025