Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Merck & Co., Inc. or Bausch Health Companies Inc.

Merck vs. Bausch: Who Masters SG&A Efficiency?

__timestampBausch Health Companies Inc.Merck & Co., Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014202630000011606000000
Thursday, January 1, 2015268270000010313000000
Friday, January 1, 201628100000009762000000
Sunday, January 1, 201725820000009830000000
Monday, January 1, 2018247300000010102000000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019255400000010615000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202023670000008955000000
Friday, January 1, 202126240000009634000000
Saturday, January 1, 2022262500000010042000000
Sunday, January 1, 2023291700000010504000000
Loading chart...

In pursuit of knowledge

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Giants

In the competitive landscape of the pharmaceutical industry, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Over the past decade, Merck & Co., Inc. and Bausch Health Companies Inc. have demonstrated contrasting strategies in optimizing these costs. From 2014 to 2023, Merck's SG&A expenses have shown a slight decline, with a notable reduction of approximately 10% from 2014 to 2020. In contrast, Bausch Health's expenses have fluctuated, peaking in 2023 with a 44% increase from 2014. This divergence highlights Merck's consistent cost management approach, while Bausch Health's strategy appears more variable. As the industry evolves, these trends offer valuable insights into how major players navigate financial efficiency, impacting their competitive edge and market positioning.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025