Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Merck & Co., Inc. or Cytokinetics, Incorporated

SG&A Cost Management: Merck vs. Cytokinetics

__timestampCytokinetics, IncorporatedMerck & Co., Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20141726800011606000000
Thursday, January 1, 20151966700010313000000
Friday, January 1, 2016278230009762000000
Sunday, January 1, 2017364680009830000000
Monday, January 1, 20183128200010102000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20193961000010615000000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020528200008955000000
Friday, January 1, 2021968030009634000000
Saturday, January 1, 202217797700010042000000
Sunday, January 1, 202317361200010504000000
Loading chart...

Unlocking the unknown

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Companies

In the competitive world of pharmaceuticals, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Over the past decade, Merck & Co., Inc. and Cytokinetics, Incorporated have taken different paths in optimizing these costs. From 2014 to 2023, Merck's SG&A expenses have shown a relatively stable trend, averaging around $10 billion annually. In contrast, Cytokinetics has seen a dramatic increase, with expenses rising by over 900% from 2014 to 2023.

Merck's consistent SG&A management reflects its established market position and operational efficiency. Meanwhile, Cytokinetics' rising costs may indicate aggressive expansion and investment in growth. As of 2023, Merck's expenses are approximately 60 times higher than Cytokinetics', highlighting the scale difference between the two. This comparison offers valuable insights into how established giants and emerging players navigate financial strategies in the pharmaceutical industry.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025