Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Merck & Co., Inc. or Grifols, S.A.

SG&A Cost Optimization: Merck vs. Grifols

__timestampGrifols, S.A.Merck & Co., Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201466077200011606000000
Thursday, January 1, 201573643500010313000000
Friday, January 1, 20167752660009762000000
Sunday, January 1, 20178603480009830000000
Monday, January 1, 201881477500010102000000
Tuesday, January 1, 201994282100010615000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20209856160008955000000
Friday, January 1, 202110615080009634000000
Saturday, January 1, 2022119042300010042000000
Sunday, January 1, 2023125423400010504000000
Loading chart...

Unleashing the power of data

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Comparative Analysis

In the competitive landscape of the pharmaceutical industry, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. This analysis delves into the SG&A cost optimization strategies of two industry giants: Merck & Co., Inc. and Grifols, S.A., from 2014 to 2023.

Merck & Co., Inc. consistently reported higher SG&A expenses, peaking in 2014 with a 16% higher cost than in 2020. Despite fluctuations, Merck's expenses showed a downward trend, indicating effective cost management strategies. In contrast, Grifols, S.A. exhibited a steady increase in SG&A expenses, rising by approximately 90% over the same period. This upward trend suggests a different strategic focus, possibly on expansion or increased operational activities.

Understanding these trends provides valuable insights into how these companies navigate financial challenges, offering lessons in strategic financial management for businesses worldwide.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025