Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Novartis AG or MiMedx Group, Inc.

SG&A Cost Management: Novartis vs. MiMedx

__timestampMiMedx Group, Inc.Novartis AG
Wednesday, January 1, 20149048000014993000000
Thursday, January 1, 201513338400014247000000
Friday, January 1, 201617999700014192000000
Sunday, January 1, 201722011900014997000000
Monday, January 1, 201825852800016471000000
Tuesday, January 1, 201919820500014369000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202018102200014197000000
Friday, January 1, 202119835900014886000000
Saturday, January 1, 202220878900014253000000
Sunday, January 1, 202321112400012489000000
Monday, January 1, 202412566000000
Loading chart...

Cracking the code

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Companies

In the competitive world of pharmaceuticals and biotechnology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Over the past decade, Novartis AG and MiMedx Group, Inc. have taken different paths in optimizing these costs. From 2014 to 2023, Novartis AG consistently maintained high SG&A expenses, peaking at approximately $16.5 billion in 2018. Despite this, their expenses showed a downward trend, decreasing by about 17% by 2023. In contrast, MiMedx Group, Inc. saw a steady increase in SG&A expenses, rising by 133% from 2014 to 2023. This divergence highlights Novartis's strategic cost management, while MiMedx's growth phase reflects its investment in expansion. Understanding these trends offers valuable insights into how industry giants and emerging players navigate financial strategies in a dynamic market.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025