Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Novo Nordisk A/S or Alkermes plc

SG&A Cost Management: Novo Nordisk vs. Alkermes

__timestampAlkermes plcNovo Nordisk A/S
Wednesday, January 1, 201419990500026760000000
Thursday, January 1, 201531155800032169000000
Friday, January 1, 201637413000032339000000
Sunday, January 1, 201742157800032124000000
Monday, January 1, 201852640800033313000000
Tuesday, January 1, 201959944900035830000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202053882700036886000000
Friday, January 1, 202156097700041058000000
Saturday, January 1, 202260574700050684000000
Sunday, January 1, 202368975100061598000000
Monday, January 1, 202464523800067377000000
Loading chart...

Unlocking the unknown

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Companies

In the competitive world of pharmaceuticals, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Over the past decade, Novo Nordisk A/S and Alkermes plc have taken different paths in optimizing these costs. From 2014 to 2023, Novo Nordisk's SG&A expenses have surged by approximately 130%, reflecting its aggressive expansion and marketing strategies. In contrast, Alkermes plc has seen a more modest increase of around 245%, indicating a steady but controlled growth approach.

While Novo Nordisk's expenses are significantly higher, their growth rate is more aligned with their revenue expansion, suggesting efficient cost management. Alkermes, with a smaller base, shows a higher percentage increase, which could indicate either strategic investments or rising operational costs. Understanding these trends provides valuable insights into how these companies navigate financial challenges in a dynamic market.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025