Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Novo Nordisk A/S or GSK plc

SG&A Cost Strategies: Novo Nordisk vs. GSK

__timestampGSK plcNovo Nordisk A/S
Wednesday, January 1, 2014824600000026760000000
Thursday, January 1, 2015923200000032169000000
Friday, January 1, 2016936600000032339000000
Sunday, January 1, 2017967200000032124000000
Monday, January 1, 2018991500000033313000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20191140200000035830000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20201145600000036886000000
Friday, January 1, 20211097500000041058000000
Saturday, January 1, 2022837200000050684000000
Sunday, January 1, 2023938500000061598000000
Loading chart...

Unleashing insights

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Giants

In the competitive landscape of the pharmaceutical industry, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Over the past decade, Novo Nordisk A/S and GSK plc have demonstrated contrasting strategies in this domain. From 2014 to 2023, Novo Nordisk A/S consistently reported higher SG&A expenses, peaking at approximately 6.16 billion in 2023, a staggering 130% increase from 2014. In contrast, GSK plc maintained a more stable trajectory, with expenses fluctuating around 9 billion, showing a modest 14% increase over the same period.

This data suggests that while Novo Nordisk A/S invests heavily in SG&A, possibly to fuel growth and market expansion, GSK plc opts for a more conservative approach, potentially focusing on cost efficiency. Understanding these strategies provides valuable insights into how these pharmaceutical giants navigate financial management in a dynamic market.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025