__timestamp | Elbit Systems Ltd. | PACCAR Inc |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 356171000 | 561400000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 385059000 | 541500000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 422390000 | 540200000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 413560000 | 555000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 441362000 | 644700000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 516149000 | 698500000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 514638000 | 581400000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 559113000 | 676800000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 639067000 | 726300000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 696022000 | 784600000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 585000000 |
Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data
In the competitive landscape of global industries, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. This analysis delves into the SG&A cost optimization strategies of PACCAR Inc and Elbit Systems Ltd over the past decade.
From 2014 to 2023, PACCAR Inc consistently maintained higher SG&A expenses compared to Elbit Systems Ltd. However, PACCAR's expenses grew at a slower rate, increasing by approximately 40% over the period, while Elbit Systems saw a rise of nearly 95%. This suggests that PACCAR may have implemented more effective cost-control measures.
Despite Elbit Systems' higher growth rate in SG&A expenses, both companies faced challenges in 2020, likely due to global economic disruptions. Notably, data for 2024 is incomplete, indicating potential shifts in financial strategies. This analysis underscores the importance of strategic financial management in sustaining competitive advantage.
Revenue Insights: PACCAR Inc and Elbit Systems Ltd. Performance Compared
Cost of Revenue: Key Insights for PACCAR Inc and Elbit Systems Ltd.
Key Insights on Gross Profit: PACCAR Inc vs Elbit Systems Ltd.
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: PACCAR Inc vs Saia, Inc.
Comparing SG&A Expenses: PACCAR Inc vs AECOM Trends and Insights
Comparing SG&A Expenses: PACCAR Inc vs Pool Corporation Trends and Insights
PACCAR Inc vs Elbit Systems Ltd.: Strategic Focus on R&D Spending
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: PACCAR Inc vs C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? PACCAR Inc or Nordson Corporation
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: PACCAR Inc vs Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: PACCAR Inc vs Curtiss-Wright Corporation