Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? PACCAR Inc or Elbit Systems Ltd.

SG&A Cost Optimization: PACCAR vs. Elbit Systems

__timestampElbit Systems Ltd.PACCAR Inc
Wednesday, January 1, 2014356171000561400000
Thursday, January 1, 2015385059000541500000
Friday, January 1, 2016422390000540200000
Sunday, January 1, 2017413560000555000000
Monday, January 1, 2018441362000644700000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019516149000698500000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020514638000581400000
Friday, January 1, 2021559113000676800000
Saturday, January 1, 2022639067000726300000
Sunday, January 1, 2023696022000784600000
Monday, January 1, 2024585000000
Loading chart...

Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Comparative Analysis

In the competitive landscape of global industries, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. This analysis delves into the SG&A cost optimization strategies of PACCAR Inc and Elbit Systems Ltd over the past decade.

A Decade of Financial Strategy

From 2014 to 2023, PACCAR Inc consistently maintained higher SG&A expenses compared to Elbit Systems Ltd. However, PACCAR's expenses grew at a slower rate, increasing by approximately 40% over the period, while Elbit Systems saw a rise of nearly 95%. This suggests that PACCAR may have implemented more effective cost-control measures.

Key Insights

Despite Elbit Systems' higher growth rate in SG&A expenses, both companies faced challenges in 2020, likely due to global economic disruptions. Notably, data for 2024 is incomplete, indicating potential shifts in financial strategies. This analysis underscores the importance of strategic financial management in sustaining competitive advantage.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025