Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Pharming Group N.V. or Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Pharming vs. Supernus: A Decade of SG&A Cost Strategies

__timestampPharming Group N.V.Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014404202572471000
Thursday, January 1, 2015527955789204000
Friday, January 1, 20168073913106010000
Sunday, January 1, 201744864073137905000
Monday, January 1, 201853488904159888000
Tuesday, January 1, 201965896361158425000
Wednesday, January 1, 202069968267200677000
Friday, January 1, 202192047281304759000
Saturday, January 1, 2022131819000377221000
Sunday, January 1, 202387501000336361000
Loading chart...

Unleashing the power of data

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Pharmaceutical Giants

In the competitive world of pharmaceuticals, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Over the past decade, Pharming Group N.V. and Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. have showcased contrasting strategies in this domain. From 2014 to 2023, Pharming Group N.V. saw a steady increase in SG&A expenses, peaking in 2022 with a 2,160% rise from 2014. In contrast, Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. consistently maintained higher SG&A costs, with a notable 420% increase over the same period.

A Decade of Financial Strategy

Pharming Group N.V. demonstrated a more volatile approach, with expenses fluctuating significantly year-on-year. Meanwhile, Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. exhibited a more consistent upward trend, reflecting a strategic investment in administrative capabilities. As of 2023, Supernus's SG&A expenses were nearly four times higher than Pharming's, highlighting their aggressive growth strategy. This analysis underscores the diverse approaches companies take in optimizing operational costs, shaping their financial futures.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025