Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. or Summit Therapeutics Inc.

Biotech Giants' SG&A Strategies: A Decade of Divergence

__timestampRegeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Summit Therapeutics Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20145047550006795238
Thursday, January 1, 20158385260007454247
Friday, January 1, 2016117769700010345862
Sunday, January 1, 2017132043300016984203
Monday, January 1, 2018155620000016187290
Tuesday, January 1, 201918348000009299233.54
Wednesday, January 1, 2020134600000019232000
Friday, January 1, 2021182490000023611000
Saturday, January 1, 2022211590000026700000
Sunday, January 1, 2023263130000028215000
Monday, January 1, 20242954400000
Loading chart...

Cracking the code

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Biotech Giants

In the competitive world of biotechnology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Summit Therapeutics Inc. have taken different paths in optimizing these costs. From 2014 to 2023, Regeneron has seen a steady increase in SG&A expenses, peaking at approximately $2.63 billion in 2023. This represents a fivefold increase from 2014, reflecting their aggressive expansion and investment in administrative capabilities. In contrast, Summit Therapeutics has maintained a more conservative approach, with SG&A expenses growing modestly from around $6.8 million in 2014 to $28.2 million in 2023. This strategic restraint highlights Summit's focus on lean operations. As the biotech industry continues to evolve, these contrasting strategies offer valuable insights into cost management and operational efficiency.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025