Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Salesforce, Inc. or Lam Research Corporation

Salesforce vs. Lam Research: SG&A Cost Strategies Unveiled

__timestampLam Research CorporationSalesforce, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20146133410002764851000
Thursday, January 1, 20155916110003437032000
Friday, January 1, 20166309540003951445000
Sunday, January 1, 20176674850004777000000
Monday, January 1, 20187622190005760000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20197024070007410000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20206824790009634000000
Friday, January 1, 202182987500011761000000
Saturday, January 1, 202288573700014453000000
Sunday, January 1, 202383275300016079000000
Monday, January 1, 202486824700015411000000
Loading chart...

Unlocking the unknown

Optimizing SG&A: A Tale of Two Giants

In the competitive landscape of technology and semiconductor industries, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Salesforce, Inc. and Lam Research Corporation, two industry leaders, have shown contrasting approaches over the past decade. From 2014 to 2024, Salesforce's SG&A expenses surged by approximately 456%, reflecting its aggressive growth strategy. In contrast, Lam Research maintained a more stable trajectory, with a modest increase of around 42% in the same period.

A Decade of Financial Strategy

Salesforce's rapid expansion is evident in its SG&A expenses, which peaked in 2023, highlighting its investment in scaling operations. Meanwhile, Lam Research's steady approach suggests a focus on efficiency and cost control. This divergence in strategy underscores the different paths companies can take to optimize costs while pursuing growth. As we look to the future, these trends offer valuable insights into how companies can balance expansion with financial prudence.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025