Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Sanofi or Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited

Sanofi vs. Teva: A Decade of SG&A Cost Strategies

__timestampSanofiTeva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited
Wednesday, January 1, 201485650000005078000000
Thursday, January 1, 201594960000004717000000
Friday, January 1, 201695920000005096000000
Sunday, January 1, 2017101640000004986000000
Monday, January 1, 201899340000004214000000
Tuesday, January 1, 201998830000003806000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202093900000003671000000
Friday, January 1, 202195550000003528000000
Saturday, January 1, 2022105390000003445000000
Sunday, January 1, 2023107650000003498000000
Monday, January 1, 202491830000003702000000
Loading chart...

Cracking the code

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Pharmaceutical Giants

In the competitive world of pharmaceuticals, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, Sanofi and Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited have taken different paths in optimizing these costs.

Sanofi's Steady Climb

From 2014 to 2023, Sanofi's SG&A expenses have shown a consistent upward trend, increasing by approximately 26%. This growth reflects Sanofi's strategic investments in marketing and administration, which may be aimed at expanding its global footprint and enhancing operational efficiency.

Teva's Cost-Cutting Journey

In contrast, Teva has successfully reduced its SG&A expenses by about 31% over the same period. This significant decrease suggests a focused effort on cost-cutting measures, possibly in response to financial challenges and a need to streamline operations.

Conclusion

While Sanofi invests in growth, Teva focuses on efficiency. Both strategies highlight the diverse approaches companies can take to optimize SG&A costs in the pharmaceutical industry.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025