Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Sanofi or Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.

Sanofi vs. Neurocrine: A Decade of SG&A Cost Strategies

__timestampNeurocrine Biosciences, Inc.Sanofi
Wednesday, January 1, 2014179860008565000000
Thursday, January 1, 2015324800009496000000
Friday, January 1, 2016680810009592000000
Sunday, January 1, 201716990600010164000000
Monday, January 1, 20182489320009934000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20193541000009883000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20204333000009390000000
Friday, January 1, 20215833000009555000000
Saturday, January 1, 202275270000010539000000
Sunday, January 1, 202388760000010765000000
Monday, January 1, 202410072000009183000000
Loading chart...

Unleashing the power of data

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Companies

In the competitive world of pharmaceuticals, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Over the past decade, Sanofi and Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. have taken different paths in optimizing these costs. From 2014 to 2023, Sanofi's SG&A expenses have remained relatively stable, fluctuating around $10 billion annually. In contrast, Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. has seen a dramatic increase, with expenses growing from approximately $18 million in 2014 to nearly $888 million in 2023, marking a staggering 4,800% rise.

While Sanofi's consistent spending reflects a mature market strategy, Neurocrine's rapid increase suggests aggressive expansion and investment in growth. This divergence highlights the strategic choices companies face in balancing cost management with growth ambitions. As the pharmaceutical landscape evolves, these strategies will play a pivotal role in shaping their future success.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025