Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Novo Nordisk A/S or Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc.

SG&A Cost Management: Novo Nordisk vs. Sarepta Therapeutics

__timestampNovo Nordisk A/SSarepta Therapeutics, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20142676000000049315000
Thursday, January 1, 20153216900000075043000
Friday, January 1, 20163233900000083749000
Sunday, January 1, 201732124000000122682000
Monday, January 1, 201833313000000207761000
Tuesday, January 1, 201935830000000284812000
Wednesday, January 1, 202036886000000317875000
Friday, January 1, 202141058000000282660000
Saturday, January 1, 202250684000000451421000
Sunday, January 1, 202361598000000481871000
Monday, January 1, 202467377000000
Loading chart...

Cracking the code

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Companies

In the competitive world of pharmaceuticals, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Novo Nordisk A/S and Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. offer a fascinating study in contrasts. Over the past decade, Novo Nordisk has consistently maintained higher SG&A expenses, peaking at approximately $61.6 billion in 2023. This reflects their expansive global operations and robust marketing strategies. In contrast, Sarepta Therapeutics, with a focus on niche markets, has kept its SG&A costs significantly lower, reaching around $482 million in 2023.

Despite the disparity in absolute numbers, both companies have shown a steady increase in SG&A expenses over the years. Novo Nordisk's expenses grew by about 130% from 2014 to 2023, while Sarepta's increased by nearly 878%. This data highlights the different strategic approaches each company takes in managing operational costs.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025