Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. or Vericel Corporation

Biotech Giants: SG&A Cost Management Showdown

__timestampSarepta Therapeutics, Inc.Vericel Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 20144931500013774000
Thursday, January 1, 20157504300022479000
Friday, January 1, 20168374900027388000
Sunday, January 1, 201712268200035610000
Monday, January 1, 201820776100049007000
Tuesday, January 1, 201928481200061139000
Wednesday, January 1, 202031787500068836000
Friday, January 1, 202128266000097592000
Saturday, January 1, 2022451421000106903000
Sunday, January 1, 2023481871000120998000
Loading chart...

Unlocking the unknown

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Biotechs

In the competitive world of biotechnology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for financial health. Over the past decade, Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. and Vericel Corporation have taken different paths in optimizing these costs.

From 2014 to 2023, Sarepta's SG&A expenses surged by over 870%, reflecting its aggressive growth strategy. In contrast, Vericel's expenses increased by approximately 780%, indicating a more measured approach. Notably, in 2023, Sarepta's SG&A expenses were nearly four times higher than Vericel's, highlighting its expansive operational scale.

While both companies have seen significant increases, the data suggests that Vericel has maintained a more consistent and controlled growth in SG&A costs. This strategic management could position Vericel favorably in terms of operational efficiency, potentially offering a competitive edge in the biotech sector.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025