Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. or Masco Corporation

SG&A Cost Management: Stanley Black & Decker vs. Masco

__timestampMasco CorporationStanley Black & Decker, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201416070000002595900000
Thursday, January 1, 201513390000002486400000
Friday, January 1, 201614030000002623900000
Sunday, January 1, 201714420000002980100000
Monday, January 1, 201814780000003171700000
Tuesday, January 1, 201912740000003041000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202012920000003089600000
Friday, January 1, 202114130000003240400000
Saturday, January 1, 202213900000003370000000
Sunday, January 1, 202314810000002829300000
Monday, January 1, 202414680000003310500000
Loading chart...

Unleashing the power of data

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Giants

In the competitive landscape of the home improvement and tools industry, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Over the past decade, Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. and Masco Corporation have demonstrated contrasting strategies in optimizing these costs.

From 2014 to 2023, Stanley Black & Decker's SG&A expenses fluctuated, peaking in 2022 with a 30% increase from 2014. Meanwhile, Masco Corporation maintained a more stable trajectory, with a modest 8% rise over the same period. Notably, Masco's expenses dipped significantly in 2019, showcasing their ability to adapt to market conditions.

This data highlights the importance of strategic cost management in sustaining growth and competitiveness. As these industry leaders continue to evolve, their approaches to SG&A optimization will remain a key factor in their financial success.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025