Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Summit Therapeutics Inc. or Axsome Therapeutics, Inc.

SG&A Cost Management: Axsome vs. Summit

__timestampAxsome Therapeutics, Inc.Summit Therapeutics Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201413928306795238
Thursday, January 1, 201524192897454247
Friday, January 1, 2016634364810345862
Sunday, January 1, 2017720669116984203
Monday, January 1, 2018935152216187290
Tuesday, January 1, 2019135980309299233.54
Wednesday, January 1, 20202889674919232000
Friday, January 1, 20216664620523611000
Saturday, January 1, 202215925366126700000
Sunday, January 1, 202332312300028215000
Monday, January 1, 2024411359000
Loading chart...

Unleashing the power of data

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Therapeutics

In the competitive world of biotechnology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for financial health. Over the past decade, Axsome Therapeutics, Inc. and Summit Therapeutics Inc. have taken different paths in optimizing these costs.

Axsome's Exponential Growth

Axsome Therapeutics has seen a staggering increase in SG&A expenses, growing from approximately $1.4 million in 2014 to over $320 million in 2023. This represents a growth of over 22,000%, reflecting their aggressive expansion and investment in administrative capabilities.

Summit's Steady Approach

In contrast, Summit Therapeutics has maintained a more conservative trajectory, with SG&A expenses increasing from around $6.8 million in 2014 to $28 million in 2023, a growth of about 310%. This steady approach suggests a focus on sustainable growth and cost management.

Both companies illustrate distinct strategies in managing operational costs, offering valuable insights into the financial strategies of biotech firms.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025