Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited or QUALCOMM Incorporated

TSMC vs. QUALCOMM: A Decade of SG&A Cost Strategies

__timestampQUALCOMM IncorporatedTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited
Wednesday, January 1, 2014229000000024020800000
Thursday, January 1, 2015234400000022921900000
Friday, January 1, 2016238500000025696400000
Sunday, January 1, 2017265800000027169200000
Monday, January 1, 2018298600000026253700000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019219500000028085800000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020207400000035570400000
Friday, January 1, 2021233900000044488200000
Saturday, January 1, 2022257000000063445300000
Sunday, January 1, 2023248300000071464000000
Monday, January 1, 2024275900000096889000000
Loading chart...

Cracking the code

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Giants

In the competitive world of semiconductors and telecommunications, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Over the past decade, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (TSMC) and QUALCOMM Incorporated have showcased contrasting strategies in optimizing these costs.

From 2014 to 2024, TSMC's SG&A expenses surged by approximately 300%, reflecting its aggressive expansion and market dominance. In contrast, QUALCOMM maintained a more stable trajectory, with a modest increase of around 20% over the same period. This stability highlights QUALCOMM's focus on operational efficiency amidst fluctuating market conditions.

While TSMC's higher expenses might suggest inefficiency, they also indicate strategic investments in growth and innovation. Meanwhile, QUALCOMM's steady approach underscores its commitment to cost control and sustainable growth. As these industry leaders continue to evolve, their SG&A strategies offer valuable insights into balancing growth with financial prudence.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025