Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited or Alkermes plc

SG&A Cost Efficiency: Takeda vs. Alkermes

__timestampAlkermes plcTakeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited
Wednesday, January 1, 2014199905000612613000000
Thursday, January 1, 2015311558000650773000000
Friday, January 1, 2016374130000619061000000
Sunday, January 1, 2017421578000628106000000
Monday, January 1, 2018526408000717599000000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019599449000964737000000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020538827000875663000000
Friday, January 1, 2021560977000886361000000
Saturday, January 1, 2022605747000997309000000
Sunday, January 1, 20236897510001053819000000
Monday, January 1, 20241053819000000
Loading chart...

Unleashing the power of data

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Pharmaceutical Giants

In the competitive world of pharmaceuticals, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. This analysis compares the SG&A cost optimization strategies of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited and Alkermes plc from 2014 to 2023.

A Decade of Financial Strategy

Over the past decade, Takeda has consistently reported higher SG&A expenses, peaking at approximately 1.05 trillion in 2023. In contrast, Alkermes has shown a more modest increase, with expenses rising from around 200 million in 2014 to nearly 690 million in 2023. This represents a growth of over 240% for Alkermes, while Takeda's expenses grew by about 72% during the same period.

Insights and Implications

The data suggests that while Takeda operates on a larger scale, Alkermes may be more efficient in managing its SG&A costs relative to its size. This efficiency could provide Alkermes with a competitive edge in the long run, especially if it continues to optimize its operational costs.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025