Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited or Genmab A/S

SG&A Cost Management: Takeda vs. Genmab

__timestampGenmab A/STakeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited
Wednesday, January 1, 201479529000612613000000
Thursday, January 1, 201591224000650773000000
Friday, January 1, 2016102413000619061000000
Sunday, January 1, 2017146987000628106000000
Monday, January 1, 2018213695000717599000000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019342000000964737000000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020661000000875663000000
Friday, January 1, 20211283000000886361000000
Saturday, January 1, 20222676000000997309000000
Sunday, January 1, 202332970000001053819000000
Monday, January 1, 20241053819000000
Loading chart...

Unleashing insights

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Pharmaceutical Giants

In the competitive world of pharmaceuticals, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Over the past decade, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited and Genmab A/S have showcased contrasting strategies in this domain. From 2014 to 2023, Takeda's SG&A expenses have consistently been higher, peaking at over 1 trillion in 2023, reflecting its expansive global operations. In contrast, Genmab's expenses, though rising, reached approximately 3.3 billion in the same year, indicating a more streamlined approach.

While Takeda's expenses grew by about 72% from 2014 to 2023, Genmab's surged by an impressive 4,000%, highlighting its rapid expansion and investment in growth. The data for 2024 is incomplete, but the trend suggests Takeda's continued dominance in expenditure. This analysis provides a fascinating insight into how these companies balance growth with cost management.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025