Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Taro Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. or Viridian Therapeutics, Inc.

SG&A Cost Management: Taro vs. Viridian

__timestampTaro Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.Viridian Therapeutics, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014917330007751000
Thursday, January 1, 20158764400010251000
Friday, January 1, 2016923650009575000
Sunday, January 1, 20178565600010912000
Monday, January 1, 20188819600011049000
Tuesday, January 1, 20198997100011646000
Wednesday, January 1, 20209341300013265000
Friday, January 1, 20219135500025805000
Saturday, January 1, 202211367600035182000
Sunday, January 1, 202319836600094999000
Monday, January 1, 2024218935000
Loading chart...

In pursuit of knowledge

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Companies

In the competitive world of pharmaceuticals, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Taro Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. and Viridian Therapeutics, Inc. offer a fascinating study in contrasts. Over the past decade, Taro has consistently maintained higher SG&A expenses, peaking in 2024 with a 138% increase from 2014. In contrast, Viridian's SG&A costs have shown a more volatile pattern, with a significant surge in 2023, marking a 1,125% increase from 2014. This dramatic rise suggests aggressive expansion or restructuring efforts. While Taro's steady increase reflects a more controlled approach, Viridian's fluctuating expenses indicate a dynamic strategy. Missing data for 2024 suggests ongoing developments. As these companies navigate the complexities of the pharmaceutical industry, their SG&A strategies will be pivotal in determining their financial health and competitive edge.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025