Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated or Alpine Immune Sciences, Inc.

Biotech Giants: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

__timestampAlpine Immune Sciences, Inc.Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated
Wednesday, January 1, 20142287709305409000
Thursday, January 1, 20156844000377080000
Friday, January 1, 20168586000432829000
Sunday, January 1, 20176079000496079000
Monday, January 1, 20188362000557616000
Tuesday, January 1, 20199467000658498000
Wednesday, January 1, 202010899000770456000
Friday, January 1, 202114560000840100000
Saturday, January 1, 202217968000944700000
Sunday, January 1, 2023222220001136600000
Monday, January 1, 20241464300000
Loading chart...

Unleashing the power of data

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Biotech Companies

In the competitive world of biotechnology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability and growth. Over the past decade, Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated and Alpine Immune Sciences, Inc. have taken different paths in optimizing these costs.

Vertex Pharmaceuticals: A Steady Climb

From 2014 to 2023, Vertex Pharmaceuticals saw a consistent increase in SG&A expenses, rising from approximately $305 million to over $1.1 billion. This represents a nearly 270% increase, reflecting the company's aggressive expansion and investment in administrative capabilities to support its growing portfolio.

Alpine Immune Sciences: A More Modest Approach

In contrast, Alpine Immune Sciences started with a modest $2.3 million in 2014, reaching $22 million by 2023. This tenfold increase, while significant, is dwarfed by Vertex's growth, highlighting Alpine's more conservative approach to scaling its operations.

Both companies demonstrate unique strategies in managing SG&A costs, offering valuable insights into the diverse approaches within the biotech industry.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025