Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated or ImmunityBio, Inc.

Biotech Giants' SG&A Strategies: Vertex vs. ImmunityBio

__timestampImmunityBio, Inc.Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated
Wednesday, January 1, 20144326000305409000
Thursday, January 1, 2015226206000377080000
Friday, January 1, 201694391000432829000
Sunday, January 1, 201753821000496079000
Monday, January 1, 201835463000557616000
Tuesday, January 1, 201946456000658498000
Wednesday, January 1, 202071318000770456000
Friday, January 1, 2021135256000840100000
Saturday, January 1, 2022102708000944700000
Sunday, January 1, 20231296200001136600000
Monday, January 1, 20241464300000
Loading chart...

In pursuit of knowledge

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Biotech Giants

In the competitive world of biotechnology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability and operational efficiency. Over the past decade, Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated and ImmunityBio, Inc. have showcased contrasting strategies in optimizing these costs.

From 2014 to 2023, Vertex Pharmaceuticals consistently maintained higher SG&A expenses, peaking at approximately $1.14 billion in 2023. This reflects a strategic investment in administrative capabilities and market expansion. In contrast, ImmunityBio's SG&A expenses were significantly lower, with a peak of around $226 million in 2015, indicating a leaner operational model.

Despite ImmunityBio's lower expenses, Vertex's approach suggests a robust infrastructure supporting its growth. The data reveals a 270% increase in Vertex's SG&A expenses over the decade, compared to a 2900% increase for ImmunityBio, highlighting different growth trajectories and cost management philosophies.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025