Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc. or ImmunityBio, Inc.

Biotech Giants: SG&A Cost Strategies Compared

__timestampCymaBay Therapeutics, Inc.ImmunityBio, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201481850004326000
Thursday, January 1, 20158871000226206000
Friday, January 1, 2016964500094391000
Sunday, January 1, 20171238700053821000
Monday, January 1, 20181438100035463000
Tuesday, January 1, 20191923800046456000
Wednesday, January 1, 20201742500071318000
Friday, January 1, 202123040000135256000
Saturday, January 1, 202225116000102708000
Sunday, January 1, 202351953000129620000
Loading chart...

Unleashing the power of data

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Biotech Companies

In the competitive world of biotechnology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for financial health. Over the past decade, CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc. and ImmunityBio, Inc. have taken different paths in optimizing these costs. From 2014 to 2023, CymaBay's SG&A expenses grew steadily, peaking at approximately $52 million in 2023, a sixfold increase from 2014. In contrast, ImmunityBio's expenses fluctuated significantly, with a dramatic spike in 2015, reaching over $226 million, before stabilizing around $130 million in 2023.

CymaBay's consistent growth in SG&A expenses suggests a strategic investment in administrative capabilities, while ImmunityBio's volatile pattern may reflect aggressive expansion efforts. Understanding these trends provides valuable insights into each company's operational strategies and financial priorities. As the biotech industry continues to evolve, monitoring SG&A optimization remains a key indicator of a company's adaptability and long-term success.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025