ADMA Biologics, Inc. and Catalyst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared

Biotech SG&A Trends: ADMA vs. Catalyst

__timestampADMA Biologics, Inc.Catalyst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201448238694473654
Thursday, January 1, 201567459688597010
Friday, January 1, 201684947427910260
Sunday, January 1, 2017180928357304399
Monday, January 1, 20182250292215875961
Tuesday, January 1, 20192591075736881187
Wednesday, January 1, 20203505081744233754
Friday, January 1, 20214289688949628000
Saturday, January 1, 20225245802458183000
Sunday, January 1, 202359020000133710000
Loading chart...

Data in motion

SG&A Spending Patterns: A Tale of Two Biotechs

In the dynamic world of biotechnology, understanding financial trends is crucial. Over the past decade, ADMA Biologics, Inc. and Catalyst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. have shown distinct patterns in their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses. From 2014 to 2023, ADMA Biologics saw a steady increase in SG&A spending, growing by over 1,100%. In contrast, Catalyst Pharmaceuticals experienced a more dramatic rise, with expenses surging by nearly 2,900% during the same period.

This divergence highlights the strategic differences between the two companies. While ADMA Biologics has maintained a consistent growth trajectory, Catalyst Pharmaceuticals' spending spiked significantly in 2023, indicating a potential shift in business strategy or market expansion. These insights provide a window into the operational priorities and financial health of these biotech firms, offering valuable lessons for investors and industry analysts alike.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025