ADMA Biologics, Inc. vs Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: SG&A Expense Trends

Biotech Giants' SG&A Expenses: A Decade of Growth and Strategy

__timestampADMA Biologics, Inc.Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014482386924419536
Thursday, January 1, 2015674596834718089
Friday, January 1, 2016849474240998209
Sunday, January 1, 20171809283532022880
Monday, January 1, 20182250292219110051
Tuesday, January 1, 20192591075726556257
Wednesday, January 1, 20203505081752275890
Friday, January 1, 20214289688980981000
Saturday, January 1, 202252458024124431000
Sunday, January 1, 20235902000090932000
Monday, January 1, 202498761000
Loading chart...

In pursuit of knowledge

SG&A Expense Trends: ADMA Biologics vs. Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals

In the ever-evolving landscape of biotechnology, understanding financial trends is crucial. Over the past decade, ADMA Biologics, Inc. and Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc. have shown distinct trajectories in their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses. From 2014 to 2023, ADMA Biologics saw a staggering increase of over 1,100% in SG&A expenses, reflecting its aggressive growth strategy. In contrast, Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals experienced a more moderate rise of approximately 270% during the same period, indicating a steady expansion approach.

Interestingly, 2022 marked a peak for Arrowhead, with expenses reaching nearly double those of ADMA. However, 2023 saw a slight decline for Arrowhead, suggesting potential strategic shifts or cost optimizations. Missing data for 2024 leaves room for speculation on future trends. These insights provide a window into the strategic priorities and operational efficiencies of these biotech players.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025