Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. or Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

Alnylam vs. Sarepta: SG&A Cost Management Showdown

__timestampAlnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20144452600049315000
Thursday, January 1, 20156061000075043000
Friday, January 1, 20168935400083749000
Sunday, January 1, 2017199365000122682000
Monday, January 1, 2018382359000207761000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019479005000284812000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020588420000317875000
Friday, January 1, 2021620639000282660000
Saturday, January 1, 2022770658000451421000
Sunday, January 1, 2023795646000481871000
Monday, January 1, 2024975526000
Loading chart...

Igniting the spark of knowledge

Alnylam vs. Sarepta: A Decade of SG&A Management

In the competitive world of biotechnology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for sustaining growth and innovation. Over the past decade, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. have demonstrated contrasting approaches to SG&A cost management. From 2014 to 2023, Alnylam's SG&A expenses surged by approximately 1,700%, reflecting its aggressive expansion strategy. In contrast, Sarepta's expenses grew by about 880%, indicating a more conservative approach.

Key Insights

  • 2014-2016: Both companies maintained relatively low SG&A costs, with Alnylam slightly trailing behind Sarepta.
  • 2017-2020: Alnylam's expenses began to outpace Sarepta's, peaking at nearly double by 2020.
  • 2021-2023: Alnylam continued its upward trend, reaching a high of 795 million in 2023, while Sarepta's expenses rose to 482 million.

This analysis highlights the strategic differences in cost management between these two biotech giants.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025