Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. or Viking Therapeutics, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

Alnylam vs. Viking: A Decade of SG&A Cost Management

__timestampAlnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Viking Therapeutics, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014445260001244910
Thursday, January 1, 2015606100005029636
Friday, January 1, 2016893540004846776
Sunday, January 1, 20171993650005329003
Monday, January 1, 20183823590007121000
Tuesday, January 1, 20194790050009128000
Wednesday, January 1, 202058842000010731000
Friday, January 1, 202162063900010701000
Saturday, January 1, 202277065800016121000
Sunday, January 1, 202379564600037021000
Monday, January 1, 2024975526000
Loading chart...

In pursuit of knowledge

Managing SG&A Costs: Alnylam vs. Viking

In the competitive world of pharmaceuticals, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Viking Therapeutics, Inc. have shown contrasting approaches over the past decade. From 2014 to 2023, Alnylam's SG&A expenses surged by over 1,600%, peaking at nearly $800 million in 2023. This reflects their aggressive expansion and investment in administrative capabilities. In contrast, Viking Therapeutics maintained a more conservative growth, with SG&A costs increasing by approximately 2,900% but still only reaching about $37 million in 2023. This stark difference highlights Viking's lean operational strategy compared to Alnylam's expansive approach. As investors and industry analysts evaluate these companies, understanding their cost management strategies provides valuable insights into their long-term sustainability and market positioning.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025