__timestamp | Bristol-Myers Squibb Company | Grifols, S.A. |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 3932000000 | 1656170000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 3909000000 | 2003565000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 4946000000 | 2137539000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 6066000000 | 2166062000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 6547000000 | 2437164000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 8078000000 | 2757459000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 11773000000 | 3084873000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 9940000000 | 2970522000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 10137000000 | 3832437000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 10693000000 | 4269276000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 11949000000 |
Infusing magic into the data realm
In the ever-evolving pharmaceutical industry, understanding cost dynamics is crucial. Over the past decade, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and Grifols, S.A. have showcased distinct trends in their cost of revenue. From 2014 to 2023, Bristol-Myers Squibb's cost of revenue surged by approximately 172%, peaking in 2020 with a notable 11% increase from the previous year. This reflects their aggressive expansion and investment in innovative therapies. Meanwhile, Grifols, S.A. experienced a steady rise, with a 158% increase over the same period, highlighting their strategic focus on plasma-derived medicines. By 2023, Grifols' cost of revenue reached 4.27 billion, marking a 12% rise from 2022. These trends underscore the companies' differing strategies in navigating the competitive landscape, with Bristol-Myers Squibb focusing on high-cost innovation and Grifols on steady growth in plasma products. This analysis offers a window into the financial strategies shaping the future of healthcare.
Johnson & Johnson vs Grifols, S.A.: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored
Cost of Revenue Trends: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company vs BeiGene, Ltd.
Cost of Revenue Trends: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company vs Insmed Incorporated
Cost of Revenue: Key Insights for Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc.
Cost of Revenue Trends: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company vs Cytokinetics, Incorporated
Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated vs Grifols, S.A.
Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc. vs Grifols, S.A.
Cost of Revenue Comparison: Lantheus Holdings, Inc. vs Grifols, S.A.
Analyzing Cost of Revenue: Grifols, S.A. and Perrigo Company plc
Cost of Revenue Trends: Grifols, S.A. vs MorphoSys AG
Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Grifols, S.A. vs Taro Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.