Analyzing Cost of Revenue: Microsoft Corporation and Applied Materials, Inc.

Microsoft vs. Applied Materials: A Decade of Revenue Cost Analysis

__timestampApplied Materials, Inc.Microsoft Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 2014522900000027078000000
Thursday, January 1, 2015570700000033038000000
Friday, January 1, 2016631400000032780000000
Sunday, January 1, 2017800500000034261000000
Monday, January 1, 2018943600000038353000000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019822200000042910000000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020951000000046078000000
Friday, January 1, 20211214900000052232000000
Saturday, January 1, 20221379200000062650000000
Sunday, January 1, 20231413300000065863000000
Monday, January 1, 20241427900000074114000000
Loading chart...

Unlocking the unknown

Analyzing Cost of Revenue: Microsoft vs. Applied Materials

In the ever-evolving landscape of technology, understanding the cost of revenue is crucial for evaluating a company's financial health. This analysis delves into the cost of revenue trends for Microsoft Corporation and Applied Materials, Inc. from 2014 to 2024. Over this decade, Microsoft has consistently outpaced Applied Materials, with its cost of revenue growing by approximately 174%, from $27 billion in 2014 to an estimated $74 billion in 2024. In contrast, Applied Materials saw a 173% increase, from $5 billion to $14 billion in the same period.

Key Insights

  • Microsoft's Dominance: Microsoft's cost of revenue surged, reflecting its expansive growth and market dominance.
  • Steady Growth for Applied Materials: Despite being smaller, Applied Materials maintained a steady upward trajectory, highlighting its resilience in the semiconductor industry.

These insights underscore the dynamic nature of the tech industry and the strategic maneuvers companies must undertake to thrive.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025