Microsoft Corporation vs International Business Machines Corporation: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored

Microsoft vs. IBM: A Decade of Cost Efficiency Compared

__timestampInternational Business Machines CorporationMicrosoft Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 20144638600000027078000000
Thursday, January 1, 20154105700000033038000000
Friday, January 1, 20164140300000032780000000
Sunday, January 1, 20174219600000034261000000
Monday, January 1, 20184265500000038353000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20192618100000042910000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20202431400000046078000000
Friday, January 1, 20212586500000052232000000
Saturday, January 1, 20222784200000062650000000
Sunday, January 1, 20232756000000065863000000
Monday, January 1, 20242720200000074114000000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

Unveiling Cost Efficiency: Microsoft vs. IBM

In the ever-evolving tech industry, cost efficiency is a critical measure of a company's operational prowess. From 2014 to 2024, Microsoft Corporation and International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) have showcased contrasting trajectories in their cost of revenue. While IBM's cost of revenue has seen a significant decline of approximately 41%, from $46 billion in 2014 to $27 billion in 2024, Microsoft has experienced a remarkable increase of about 174%, from $27 billion to $74 billion over the same period.

This divergence highlights Microsoft's aggressive expansion and investment strategies, which have paid off with increased revenue streams. In contrast, IBM's focus on streamlining operations and shifting towards high-margin services has resulted in reduced costs. As the tech landscape continues to shift, these giants exemplify different paths to achieving financial efficiency, offering valuable insights into strategic corporate management.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025