__timestamp | Applied Materials, Inc. | Microsoft Corporation |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 890000000 | 20488000000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 897000000 | 20324000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 819000000 | 19198000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 890000000 | 19942000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 1002000000 | 22223000000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 982000000 | 23098000000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 1093000000 | 24709000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 1229000000 | 25224000000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 1438000000 | 27725000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 1628000000 | 30334000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 1797000000 | 32065000000 |
Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data
In the ever-evolving landscape of technology, cost management remains a pivotal factor for success. Over the past decade, Microsoft Corporation and Applied Materials, Inc. have demonstrated contrasting strategies in managing their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses.
From 2014 to 2024, Microsoft has seen a steady increase in SG&A expenses, growing by approximately 56%, reflecting its expansive growth and investment in innovation. In contrast, Applied Materials, Inc. has experienced a more modest rise of about 95% over the same period, indicating a more conservative approach.
This divergence highlights the distinct paths these companies have taken in their quest for market leadership. As we look to the future, understanding these cost management strategies offers valuable insights into the financial health and strategic priorities of these industry titans.
Revenue Insights: Microsoft Corporation and Applied Materials, Inc. Performance Compared
Analyzing Cost of Revenue: Microsoft Corporation and Applied Materials, Inc.
Gross Profit Comparison: Microsoft Corporation and Applied Materials, Inc. Trends
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Microsoft Corporation and Adobe Inc.
R&D Spending Showdown: Microsoft Corporation vs Applied Materials, Inc.
Cost Management Insights: SG&A Expenses for Microsoft Corporation and International Business Machines Corporation
Microsoft Corporation and QUALCOMM Incorporated: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
Cost Management Insights: SG&A Expenses for Microsoft Corporation and Shopify Inc.
Microsoft Corporation and Texas Instruments Incorporated: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Microsoft Corporation and Arista Networks, Inc.
Microsoft Corporation vs Applied Materials, Inc.: In-Depth EBITDA Performance Comparison
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Microsoft Corporation vs Sony Group Corporation