Analyzing Cost of Revenue: Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. and Grifols, S.A.

Cost Trends in Biotech: Grifols vs. Sarepta

__timestampGrifols, S.A.Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014165617000094103000
Thursday, January 1, 20152003565000146194000
Friday, January 1, 20162137539000130000
Sunday, January 1, 201721660620007353000
Monday, January 1, 2018243716400034193000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019275745900056586000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020308487300063382000
Friday, January 1, 2021297052200097049000
Saturday, January 1, 20223832437000139989000
Sunday, January 1, 20234269276000150343000
Loading chart...

Igniting the spark of knowledge

A Decade of Cost Dynamics: Sarepta Therapeutics vs. Grifols

In the ever-evolving landscape of biotechnology and pharmaceuticals, understanding cost structures is crucial. Over the past decade, Grifols, S.A. and Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. have showcased contrasting trajectories in their cost of revenue. Grifols, a leader in plasma-derived therapies, has seen its cost of revenue grow by approximately 158% from 2014 to 2023, reflecting its expansive operations and market reach. In contrast, Sarepta, a pioneer in genetic medicine, has experienced a more volatile cost pattern, with a notable increase of over 1,500% from 2016 to 2023, highlighting its rapid growth and investment in innovative therapies. This divergence underscores the distinct strategic paths these companies have taken, shaped by their unique market positions and product portfolios. As the industry continues to innovate, monitoring these cost trends offers valuable insights into the financial health and strategic priorities of leading biotech firms.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025