| __timestamp | Applied Materials, Inc. | Seagate Technology Holdings plc |
|---|---|---|
| Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 890000000 | 722000000 |
| Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 897000000 | 857000000 |
| Friday, January 1, 2016 | 819000000 | 635000000 |
| Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 890000000 | 606000000 |
| Monday, January 1, 2018 | 1002000000 | 562000000 |
| Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 982000000 | 453000000 |
| Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 1093000000 | 473000000 |
| Friday, January 1, 2021 | 1229000000 | 502000000 |
| Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 1438000000 | 559000000 |
| Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 1628000000 | 491000000 |
| Monday, January 1, 2024 | 1797000000 | 460000000 |
Infusing magic into the data realm
In the competitive landscape of technology giants, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, Applied Materials, Inc. has demonstrated a consistent upward trend in SG&A expenses, increasing by approximately 100% from 2014 to 2024. In contrast, Seagate Technology Holdings plc has managed to keep its SG&A costs relatively stable, with a slight decrease of around 36% over the same period.
This divergence highlights Applied Materials' aggressive growth strategy, potentially investing more in marketing and administrative capabilities. Meanwhile, Seagate's cost containment approach may reflect a focus on operational efficiency. As investors and analysts evaluate these companies, understanding their SG&A management provides valuable insights into their strategic priorities and financial health.
Applied Materials, Inc. vs Seagate Technology Holdings plc: Examining Key Revenue Metrics
Analyzing Cost of Revenue: Applied Materials, Inc. and Seagate Technology Holdings plc
Gross Profit Trends Compared: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Seagate Technology Holdings plc
Research and Development Investment: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Seagate Technology Holdings plc
Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Applied Materials, Inc. and PTC Inc.
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Teledyne Technologies Incorporated
Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Applied Materials, Inc. and ON Semiconductor Corporation
Applied Materials, Inc. vs Ubiquiti Inc.: SG&A Expense Trends
Applied Materials, Inc. and STMicroelectronics N.V.: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Applied Materials, Inc. and FLEETCOR Technologies, Inc.
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Pure Storage, Inc.
A Professional Review of EBITDA: Applied Materials, Inc. Compared to Seagate Technology Holdings plc