__timestamp | Applied Materials, Inc. | Seagate Technology Holdings plc |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 5229000000 | 9878000000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 5707000000 | 9930000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 6314000000 | 8545000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 8005000000 | 7597000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 9436000000 | 7820000000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 8222000000 | 7458000000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 9510000000 | 7667000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 12149000000 | 7764000000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 13792000000 | 8192000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 14133000000 | 6033000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 14279000000 | 5005000000 |
Data in motion
In the ever-evolving landscape of technology, understanding the cost dynamics of industry leaders like Applied Materials, Inc. and Seagate Technology Holdings plc is crucial. Over the past decade, Applied Materials has seen a remarkable 173% increase in its cost of revenue, reflecting its aggressive expansion and innovation strategies. In contrast, Seagate Technology has experienced a 49% decline, indicating a strategic shift towards efficiency and cost management.
From 2014 to 2024, Applied Materials' cost of revenue surged from $5.2 billion to $14.3 billion, showcasing its commitment to scaling operations. Meanwhile, Seagate's cost of revenue decreased from $9.9 billion to $5 billion, highlighting its focus on optimizing production processes. This divergence underscores the distinct paths these companies have taken in response to market demands and technological advancements.
These trends offer valuable insights into the strategic priorities of these tech titans. Applied Materials' growth trajectory suggests a focus on capturing market share, while Seagate's cost reduction points to a leaner, more efficient operational model. As the tech industry continues to evolve, these strategies will play a pivotal role in shaping the future of both companies.
Applied Materials, Inc. vs Seagate Technology Holdings plc: Examining Key Revenue Metrics
Cost Insights: Breaking Down Applied Materials, Inc. and Ubiquiti Inc.'s Expenses
Applied Materials, Inc. vs ON Semiconductor Corporation: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored
Cost of Revenue Trends: Applied Materials, Inc. vs PTC Inc.
Cost of Revenue Comparison: Applied Materials, Inc. vs STMicroelectronics N.V.
Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Western Digital Corporation
Cost of Revenue Comparison: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Pure Storage, Inc.
Gross Profit Trends Compared: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Seagate Technology Holdings plc
Research and Development Investment: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Seagate Technology Holdings plc
Applied Materials, Inc. or Seagate Technology Holdings plc: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?
A Professional Review of EBITDA: Applied Materials, Inc. Compared to Seagate Technology Holdings plc