Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: ASML Holding N.V. vs VeriSign, Inc.

SG&A Expenses: ASML's Growth vs VeriSign's Stability

__timestampASML Holding N.V.VeriSign, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014318672000189488000
Thursday, January 1, 2015345700000196914000
Friday, January 1, 2016374800000198253000
Sunday, January 1, 2017416600000211705000
Monday, January 1, 2018488000000197559000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019520500000184262000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020544900000186003000
Friday, January 1, 2021725600000188311000
Saturday, January 1, 2022909600000195400000
Sunday, January 1, 20231113200000204200000
Monday, January 1, 20241165700000211100000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

A Comparative Analysis of SG&A Expenses: ASML Holding N.V. vs VeriSign, Inc.

In the ever-evolving landscape of global business, understanding the financial strategies of industry leaders is crucial. This analysis delves into the Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses of two prominent companies: ASML Holding N.V. and VeriSign, Inc., from 2014 to 2023.

Key Insights

ASML Holding N.V., a titan in the semiconductor industry, has seen its SG&A expenses grow by approximately 250% over the past decade, reflecting its aggressive expansion and innovation strategies. In contrast, VeriSign, Inc., a leader in domain name registry services, has maintained a more stable SG&A expenditure, with only a modest increase of around 8% during the same period.

Strategic Implications

The stark contrast in SG&A growth rates highlights differing strategic priorities. ASML's significant increase suggests a focus on scaling operations and market penetration, while VeriSign's steady expenses indicate a strategy centered on operational efficiency and cost control.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025