AstraZeneca PLC or Genmab A/S: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

AstraZeneca vs. Genmab: SG&A Cost Management Showdown

__timestampAstraZeneca PLCGenmab A/S
Wednesday, January 1, 20141332400000079529000
Thursday, January 1, 20151145100000091224000
Friday, January 1, 20169739000000102413000
Sunday, January 1, 201710543000000146987000
Monday, January 1, 201810362000000213695000
Tuesday, January 1, 201911848000000342000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202011693000000661000000
Friday, January 1, 2021156800000001283000000
Saturday, January 1, 2022189550000002676000000
Sunday, January 1, 2023180250000003297000000
Loading chart...

Cracking the code

AstraZeneca PLC vs. Genmab A/S: A Decade of SG&A Management

In the competitive landscape of pharmaceuticals, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, AstraZeneca PLC and Genmab A/S have demonstrated contrasting approaches to SG&A cost management. AstraZeneca, a global leader, has consistently reported higher SG&A expenses, peaking at approximately $18 billion in 2022. This reflects its expansive operations and aggressive marketing strategies. In contrast, Genmab A/S, a smaller biotech firm, has maintained a leaner structure, with SG&A expenses growing from $80 million in 2014 to around $3.3 billion in 2023. This represents a significant increase, yet it remains a fraction of AstraZeneca's costs. The data suggests that while AstraZeneca's scale demands higher expenditures, Genmab's growth trajectory is marked by strategic investments in administrative efficiency. As the industry evolves, these companies' SG&A strategies will continue to shape their financial health and market positions.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025