Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? AstraZeneca PLC or Gilead Sciences, Inc.

AstraZeneca vs. Gilead: SG&A Cost Strategies Unveiled

__timestampAstraZeneca PLCGilead Sciences, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014133240000002983000000
Thursday, January 1, 2015114510000003426000000
Friday, January 1, 201697390000003398000000
Sunday, January 1, 2017105430000003878000000
Monday, January 1, 2018103620000004056000000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019118480000004381000000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020116930000005151000000
Friday, January 1, 2021156800000005246000000
Saturday, January 1, 2022189550000005673000000
Sunday, January 1, 2023180250000006090000000
Loading chart...

In pursuit of knowledge

Optimizing SG&A Costs: AstraZeneca vs. Gilead Sciences

In the competitive landscape of pharmaceuticals, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. From 2014 to 2023, AstraZeneca PLC and Gilead Sciences, Inc. have shown distinct strategies in optimizing these costs. AstraZeneca's SG&A expenses have seen a significant increase, peaking at approximately 18.0 billion in 2022, a 35% rise from 2014. In contrast, Gilead Sciences maintained a more stable trajectory, with expenses growing from around 3.0 billion in 2014 to 6.1 billion in 2023, reflecting a 104% increase. This suggests AstraZeneca's aggressive investment in administrative functions, while Gilead's steadier approach may indicate a focus on cost efficiency. Understanding these trends provides valuable insights into each company's strategic priorities and operational efficiencies over the past decade.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025