Blueprint Medicines Corporation or Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

Biotech Giants: SG&A Cost Management Showdown

__timestampArrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Blueprint Medicines Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 2014244195367890000
Thursday, January 1, 20153471808914456000
Friday, January 1, 20164099820919218000
Sunday, January 1, 20173202288027986000
Monday, January 1, 20181911005147928000
Tuesday, January 1, 20192655625796388000
Wednesday, January 1, 202052275890157743000
Friday, January 1, 202180981000195293000
Saturday, January 1, 2022124431000237374000
Sunday, January 1, 202390932000295141000
Monday, January 1, 202498761000359272000
Loading chart...

Unleashing insights

Managing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Biotech Innovators

In the competitive world of biotechnology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for sustainable growth. Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Blueprint Medicines Corporation, two prominent players, have shown contrasting trends in their SG&A management from 2014 to 2023.

Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals has maintained a relatively stable SG&A growth, with expenses increasing by approximately 300% over the decade. In contrast, Blueprint Medicines has seen a staggering rise of over 3,600%, reflecting its aggressive expansion strategy. Notably, in 2023, Blueprint's SG&A expenses were more than three times those of Arrowhead, highlighting its significant investment in administrative capabilities.

While Blueprint's approach suggests a focus on rapid scaling, Arrowhead's steadier increase may indicate a more conservative, cost-effective strategy. As these companies continue to evolve, their SG&A management will remain a key indicator of their financial health and strategic priorities.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025