Blueprint Medicines Corporation or CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

Biotech Giants: A Decade of SG&A Cost Management

__timestampBlueprint Medicines CorporationCymaBay Therapeutics, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201478900008185000
Thursday, January 1, 2015144560008871000
Friday, January 1, 2016192180009645000
Sunday, January 1, 20172798600012387000
Monday, January 1, 20184792800014381000
Tuesday, January 1, 20199638800019238000
Wednesday, January 1, 202015774300017425000
Friday, January 1, 202119529300023040000
Saturday, January 1, 202223737400025116000
Sunday, January 1, 202329514100051953000
Monday, January 1, 2024359272000
Loading chart...

In pursuit of knowledge

SG&A Cost Management: A Tale of Two Biotechs

In the competitive world of biotechnology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for financial health. Blueprint Medicines Corporation and CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc. offer a fascinating study in contrasts. Over the past decade, Blueprint Medicines has seen its SG&A expenses skyrocket by nearly 3,600%, from $7.9 million in 2014 to $295 million in 2023. In contrast, CymaBay Therapeutics has maintained a more modest increase of 535%, with expenses rising from $8.2 million to $51.9 million over the same period.

While Blueprint's aggressive spending may reflect its rapid growth and expansion strategies, CymaBay's more conservative approach could indicate a focus on lean operations. Investors and industry watchers should consider these trends when evaluating the companies' long-term sustainability and strategic priorities.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025