__timestamp | Cadence Design Systems, Inc. | Microsoft Corporation |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 513307000 | 20488000000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 512414000 | 20324000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 520300000 | 19198000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 553342000 | 19942000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 573075000 | 22223000000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 621479000 | 23098000000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 670885000 | 24709000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 749280000 | 25224000000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 846340000 | 27725000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 920649000 | 30334000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 1039766000 | 32065000000 |
Infusing magic into the data realm
In the ever-evolving tech industry, understanding the financial strategies of giants like Microsoft Corporation and Cadence Design Systems, Inc. is crucial. Over the past decade, Microsoft's Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses have consistently dwarfed those of Cadence, reflecting its expansive global operations. From 2014 to 2023, Microsoft's SG&A expenses grew by approximately 48%, peaking at over $30 billion in 2023. In contrast, Cadence's expenses increased by about 79% during the same period, reaching nearly $920 million. This disparity highlights Microsoft's broader market reach and operational scale. However, Cadence's rapid growth rate in SG&A expenses suggests a strategic push towards expansion and innovation. Notably, the data for 2024 is incomplete, indicating potential shifts in financial strategies. This analysis underscores the dynamic nature of financial management in the tech sector, where companies balance growth with operational efficiency.
Annual Revenue Comparison: Microsoft Corporation vs Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
Cost of Revenue Comparison: Microsoft Corporation vs Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
Key Insights on Gross Profit: Microsoft Corporation vs Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
Comparing Innovation Spending: Microsoft Corporation and Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
Microsoft Corporation or Infosys Limited: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Microsoft Corporation vs MicroStrategy Incorporated
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Microsoft Corporation vs Amphenol Corporation
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Microsoft Corporation vs Marvell Technology, Inc.
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Microsoft Corporation vs Intel Corporation
Microsoft Corporation and Synopsys, Inc.: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Microsoft Corporation vs Motorola Solutions, Inc.
EBITDA Analysis: Evaluating Microsoft Corporation Against Cadence Design Systems, Inc.