__timestamp | MicroStrategy Incorporated | Microsoft Corporation |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 321429000 | 20488000000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 229254000 | 20324000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 238202000 | 19198000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 254773000 | 19942000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 291659000 | 22223000000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 277932000 | 23098000000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 229046000 | 24709000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 255642000 | 25224000000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 258303000 | 27725000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 264983000 | 30334000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 278618000 | 32065000000 |
Igniting the spark of knowledge
In the ever-evolving tech industry, understanding the financial strategies of leading companies is crucial. This analysis delves into the Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses of Microsoft Corporation and MicroStrategy Incorporated from 2014 to 2023. Over this period, Microsoft's SG&A expenses have shown a consistent upward trend, peaking at approximately $30 billion in 2023, a 50% increase from 2014. In contrast, MicroStrategy's expenses have remained relatively stable, fluctuating around $260 million, with a notable dip in 2020. This disparity highlights Microsoft's expansive growth strategy, investing heavily in marketing and administration to maintain its market dominance. Meanwhile, MicroStrategy's steady expenses suggest a more conservative approach, focusing on niche markets. The data for 2024 is incomplete, indicating potential shifts in financial strategies. This comparison offers valuable insights into how these tech giants allocate resources to sustain their competitive edge.
Revenue Showdown: Microsoft Corporation vs MicroStrategy Incorporated
Cost of Revenue Trends: Microsoft Corporation vs MicroStrategy Incorporated
Gross Profit Analysis: Comparing Microsoft Corporation and MicroStrategy Incorporated
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Microsoft Corporation vs Lam Research Corporation
Microsoft Corporation or MicroStrategy Incorporated: Who Invests More in Innovation?
Microsoft Corporation or Infosys Limited: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Microsoft Corporation vs Amphenol Corporation
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Microsoft Corporation vs Marvell Technology, Inc.
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Microsoft Corporation vs Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Microsoft Corporation vs Intel Corporation
Microsoft Corporation and Synopsys, Inc.: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Microsoft Corporation vs Motorola Solutions, Inc.