__timestamp | Marvell Technology, Inc. | Microsoft Corporation |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 259169000 | 20488000000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 273982000 | 20324000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 280970000 | 19198000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 299727000 | 19942000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 238166000 | 22223000000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 424360000 | 23098000000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 464580000 | 24709000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 467240000 | 25224000000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 955245000 | 27725000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 843600000 | 30334000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 834000000 | 32065000000 |
Unleashing the power of data
In the ever-evolving tech landscape, understanding the financial strategies of industry leaders is crucial. This chart offers a fascinating glimpse into the Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses of Microsoft Corporation and Marvell Technology, Inc. over the past decade. From 2014 to 2024, Microsoft's SG&A expenses have consistently dwarfed those of Marvell, averaging around $24 billion annually, compared to Marvell's $485 million. Notably, Microsoft's SG&A costs surged by approximately 56% from 2014 to 2024, reflecting its expansive growth and market dominance. Meanwhile, Marvell's expenses peaked in 2022, marking a 300% increase from 2014, indicative of its strategic investments and scaling efforts. This financial narrative underscores the contrasting scales and strategies of these tech titans, offering valuable insights into their operational priorities and market positioning.
Comparing Revenue Performance: Microsoft Corporation or Marvell Technology, Inc.?
Cost of Revenue Comparison: Microsoft Corporation vs Marvell Technology, Inc.
Microsoft Corporation vs Marvell Technology, Inc.: A Gross Profit Performance Breakdown
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Microsoft Corporation vs Lam Research Corporation
R&D Insights: How Microsoft Corporation and Marvell Technology, Inc. Allocate Funds
Microsoft Corporation or Infosys Limited: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Microsoft Corporation vs MicroStrategy Incorporated
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Microsoft Corporation vs Amphenol Corporation
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Microsoft Corporation vs Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Microsoft Corporation vs Intel Corporation
Microsoft Corporation and Synopsys, Inc.: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Microsoft Corporation vs Motorola Solutions, Inc.