Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. vs Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

SG&A Expenses: Neurocrine vs. Rhythm - A Decade of Growth

__timestampNeurocrine Biosciences, Inc.Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014179860001213000
Thursday, January 1, 2015324800003425000
Friday, January 1, 2016680810006311000
Sunday, January 1, 20171699060009518000
Monday, January 1, 201824893200028080000
Tuesday, January 1, 201935410000036550000
Wednesday, January 1, 202043330000046125000
Friday, January 1, 202158330000068486000
Saturday, January 1, 202275270000092032000
Sunday, January 1, 2023887600000117532000
Monday, January 1, 20241007200000
Loading chart...

Data in motion

A Comparative Analysis of SG&A Expenses: Neurocrine Biosciences vs. Rhythm Pharmaceuticals

In the competitive landscape of biotechnology, understanding the financial strategies of leading companies is crucial. Over the past decade, Neurocrine Biosciences and Rhythm Pharmaceuticals have shown distinct trends in their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses. Neurocrine Biosciences has seen a staggering increase of nearly 4,800% in SG&A expenses from 2014 to 2023, reflecting its aggressive growth and expansion strategies. In contrast, Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, while also experiencing growth, has increased its SG&A expenses by approximately 9,600% over the same period, indicating a rapid scaling of operations. By 2023, Neurocrine's SG&A expenses were nearly 7.5 times higher than Rhythm's, highlighting its larger operational scale. This financial trajectory offers insights into each company's strategic priorities and market positioning, providing a window into their future growth potential.

Key Insights

  • Neurocrine's SG&A expenses grew 4,800% from 2014 to 2023.
  • Rhythm's SG&A expenses increased by 9,600% in the same period.
  • By 2023, Neurocrine's expenses were 7.5 times higher than Rhythm's.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025