SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. and Dynavax Technologies Corporation

Biotech SG&A: Neurocrine vs. Dynavax Efficiency Battle

__timestampDynavax Technologies CorporationNeurocrine Biosciences, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20141776300017986000
Thursday, January 1, 20152218000032480000
Friday, January 1, 20163725700068081000
Sunday, January 1, 201727367000169906000
Monday, January 1, 201864770000248932000
Tuesday, January 1, 201974986000354100000
Wednesday, January 1, 202079256000433300000
Friday, January 1, 2021100156000583300000
Saturday, January 1, 2022131408000752700000
Sunday, January 1, 2023152946000887600000
Monday, January 1, 20241007200000
Loading chart...

Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data

SG&A Efficiency: A Tale of Two Biotechs

In the competitive world of biotechnology, managing operational expenses is crucial for sustained growth. This analysis compares the Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses of Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. and Dynavax Technologies Corporation from 2014 to 2023. Over this period, Neurocrine Biosciences has consistently outpaced Dynavax in SG&A spending, with a notable increase of over 4,800% from 2014 to 2023. In contrast, Dynavax's SG&A expenses grew by approximately 760% during the same period. This disparity highlights Neurocrine's aggressive investment in administrative and sales functions, potentially fueling its market expansion. Meanwhile, Dynavax's more conservative approach may reflect a focus on cost efficiency. As both companies navigate the evolving biotech landscape, their SG&A strategies will likely play a pivotal role in shaping their competitive positions.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025