Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Pfizer Inc. vs ImmunityBio, Inc.

Pfizer vs ImmunityBio: A Decade of SG&A Expense Trends

__timestampImmunityBio, Inc.Pfizer Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014432600014097000000
Thursday, January 1, 201522620600014809000000
Friday, January 1, 20169439100014837000000
Sunday, January 1, 20175382100014784000000
Monday, January 1, 20183546300014455000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20194645600014350000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20207131800011615000000
Friday, January 1, 202113525600012703000000
Saturday, January 1, 202210270800013677000000
Sunday, January 1, 202312962000014771000000
Monday, January 1, 202414730000000
Loading chart...

Unleashing the power of data

A Comparative Analysis of SG&A Expenses: Pfizer Inc. vs ImmunityBio, Inc.

In the ever-evolving pharmaceutical landscape, understanding the financial strategies of industry giants like Pfizer Inc. and emerging players such as ImmunityBio, Inc. is crucial. Over the past decade, Pfizer's Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses have consistently dwarfed those of ImmunityBio, highlighting a strategic focus on expansive operations and marketing. In 2023, Pfizer's SG&A expenses were approximately 115 times greater than ImmunityBio's, reflecting its global reach and extensive product portfolio.

From 2014 to 2023, Pfizer's SG&A expenses showed a slight decline, with a notable dip in 2020, possibly due to pandemic-related operational shifts. Conversely, ImmunityBio's expenses fluctuated, peaking in 2015 and 2021, indicating strategic investments in growth and innovation. This financial juxtaposition underscores the diverse approaches within the pharmaceutical sector, where established firms and newcomers navigate distinct paths to success.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025